Henry Moore, an English Sculptor, was born in Castleford,
West Yorkshire, England on July 20, 1898. Unlike several children making
whimsical fantasies about their future, Henry Moore knew he wanted to be a
sculptor at an early age, even though he produced over 7000 drawings within his
lifetime. Drawing for him mainly functioned to develop an idea for his
sculpture—“a means of generating ideas for sculpture, tapping oneself for the
initial idea” (9). Drawings served as a developmental stage, constructing a
sculptural image, and inevitably determined which sculptures were made and which
ones were discarded.
Several of Henry Moore’s notebooks have survived and
suggest his development as an artist. In 1921 Moore, attending Leeds College of
the Arts two years prior, became a student at the Royal College of Arts (RCA).
Though he was generally uninspired and felt that the teaching was narrow, he
became fascinated with the human figure, thereby, teaching himself how to draw
it. His Nude Study of a Seated Girl (1924)
was not achieved with arduous shading but rather through quickly working with
various materials. While he was studying the human figure he adopted Leon
Underwood, who had a profound influence upon Moore’s work, as his instructor.
Underwood insisted that Henry “had to know the laws of light falling on a solid
object and reflecting it back to the human eye; and that being translated into
a two-dimensional representation. [He’s] not born with this understanding; [he]
has to learn it; [he] has to be taught it” (21). According to Andrew Causey,
the almost metallic nature in the consecutive Standing Nude Girl and One
Arm Raised (1922) reflects Underwood’s influence.
Standing Figure (1923): Henry used
Standing Nude Girl, One Arm Raised (1922):
Pencil, pen and ink, brush and ink,
and Henry used chalk,
crayon, wash, pen, and
Wash. Used hatching technique to
build up ink.
Torso and reduce emphasis on the outline.
Nude Study of a Seated Girl (1924):
Henry used chalk and watercolor.
Henry Moore constructed the notion that drawing should
not imitate the effects of sculpture. Within his early sketchbooks, Moore
emphasized the idea that an image (i.e. human body) “gains strength in drawing
from being conceived in terms of mass” (24). It was in 1922, in his first visit
to Paris where Moore became influenced by Picasso’s recent paintings of giant
female figures. Due to these figures, Moore preferred “pent-up energy,”
expressed through relation of masses. Causey states, “Impersonality through
lack of facial features is a recurrent theme in Moore’s sketchbook notes. This
is demonstrated in his sketch of Two
Seated Figures.
Two Seated Figures (1924): Henry
used pencil, pen, and ink.
Moore visited the Auguste pelerine collection of Cezanne’s
in 1922, as well. Henry Moore describes Cezanne’s figures as having a “monumentality
about them [he] liked….[They] were very sculptural in the sense of being big
blocks and not a lot of surface detail about them. They are indeed monumental”
(27). Cezanne’s painting Les Grandes
Baigneuses lacked surface detail, which appeals to Moore. It eliminated
everything that was deemed unnecessary for strong expression. It had a
primitiveness that Moore liked. Thought Cezanne worked in two dimensionality,
Moore drew different lessons from historical paints and sculpture and he
explored the notion of turning two-dimensional representations into
three-dimensional figures.
Studies of Nudes (1922-1924): Henry
used pencil, pen, and ink. This sketchbook entry followed his observation of
Cezanne’s Les Granes Baigneuses. Henry was interested in making these two
dimensional figures into block-like sculptures.
In
1925, Moore was awarded an RCA scholarship to travel in Italy. While he was
there, he became interested in Giotto and the post-Giottesques leading to
Masaccio. He labeled them as being of “greatest interest” (34). Between 1928
and 1930, Moore, influenced by Italian classicism, surpassed conventional
drawing and transitioned into designs, such as Woman in Armchair (1930) and Reclining
Figure (1929). They were painted using oils—applied with both brush and
palette knife, alongside typical drawing materials like charcoal and chalk.
These two paintings’ vitality does not rest within facial expression or
gestures, but rather within the “built-up energy in the body mass” (34). This
trend of body expression continues throughout his work and even transitions
into his surrealist art later in his career.
Woman in Armchair (1930): Henry Moore used brush and
ink, as well as oil paint.
In the late 1920s, washes of color were introduced with
his first exhibition at Warren Gallery, London, in 1928. Moore included the
words “green” and “pink” in the picture titles, thus, demonstrating that his
drawing/paintings were gaining some independence from his sculptures, since his
sculptures never had color (9). Most of these drawings date from the 1920s;
however, Surrealism kindled his interest to draw once again, though less
rigorously, until the 1950s (9).
Though Henry Moore began drawing as a means of jotting
ideas down for sculpture, these drawings began to take their own collective existence.
Kenneth Clark, director of the National Gallery from 1933 to 1946, stated that
these works have a “life sequence of their own” (10). During the 1940s
(Surrealism and Neo-Romanticism periods), Moore’s drawings, though visually
connected to his sculptures, became increasingly darker within the backdrop of
World War II. Surrealist art convey vividness, surprise, undermining
expectations, and anxiety that sculptures could not. Hi surrealist art increased during this
period. He commissioned the drawing of Londoners sheltering from the Blitz in
the London Underground and of miners at work. In these years, Moore became
interested in how people were reduced to objects or rather how seeming lifeless
objects conveyed personage.
Sleeping Shelterer (1940-41): Henry
used pencil, wax crayon, colored crayon, watercolor wash, and gouache
Tube Shelter Perspective the
Liverpool Street Extension: Henry used pencil, wax crayon, colored crayon,
chalk, watercolor wash, pen and ink.
Moore’s drawings decreased in the 1950s. The reason for
this, according to Cauley, was that Moore, as a sculptor, found working with
clay as an equivalent to drawing or alleviated the need to draw. In 1974,
Kenneth Clark concluded a book of Moore’s drawings because he believed that
Moore was done drawing; however, Moore began drawing once again in the 1970s
partly due to an increase in his printmaking activity.
The reason why I chose Henry Moore as the topic of this
blog is because I am attracted to his later work. I really like surrealism
because I have a surrealistic imagination at time. There is something about
surrealism that affects my emotions and I do not know how to adequately express
how it affects me. It might be because visually it affects me while other
paintings require me to interpret what is trying to be conveyed.
Work Cited:
Causey, Andrew. "The Human Figure." The
Drawings of Henry Moore. Burlington: Lund Humphries, 2010. 7-41. Print.
Kennedy, Maev. "Henry Moore: The Invisible Man." The
Guardian. Guardian News, 18 Feb. 2010. Web. 6 Oct. 2014.
<http://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2010/feb/18/henry-moore-sculpture-tate>.
"Tube Shelter
Perspective 1941." TATE. Web. 6 Oct. 2014.
<http://www.tate.org.uk/art/artworks/moore-tube-shelter-perspective-n05709>.
No comments:
Post a Comment